Aires Tech has been a game-changer in the realm of EMF protection, drawing attention from professional athletes, celebrities, and health experts who have seen firsthand the impact of its Lifetune devices. However, innovation always meets resistance, and recently, Linus Tech Tips, a widely followed YouTube channel, attempted to discredit Aires Tech’s products with a video that, unfortunately, was filled with misleading conclusions due to flawed testing methods and a lack of understanding of the technology.
"Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
This quote perfectly encapsulates the approach taken by Linus Tech Tips in their slanderous review of Aires Tech. Instead of making an effort to understand the science of EMF modulation, they dismissed it outright based on incomplete and misleading tests. Let’s break down where they went wrong.
Rather than regurgitating the same talking points, this article will offer a fresh perspective on why EMF modulation is a necessary innovation, why the tech world is struggling to grasp it, and why mainstream science often lags behind real-world applications. Let’s dive in and expose the fundamental misunderstandings that have fueled this controversy.
Why the Tech Community Misunderstands EMF Modulation
A Preoccupation with Measuring the Wrong Metrics
The biggest flaw in Linus Tech Tips’ review of Aires Tech was that it used RF meters and spectrum analyzers—tools that measure only the intensity of electromagnetic signals, rather than their biological effects. This is like judging the quality of food based on its weight rather than its nutritional value. Intensity alone tells us nothing about how EMFs interact with the human body.
Aires Tech does not claim to block EMFs because blocking is neither practical nor effective. Instead, their devices modulate electromagnetic fields to reduce biological disruption—something traditional RF meters cannot measure.
The Science of Modulation: Why It’s Not a “Placebo”
There is a fundamental misunderstanding between shielding and modulation. The traditional approach to EMF mitigation has focused on shielding—creating barriers that block EMFs. But in a wireless world, blocking signals isn’t practical.
Aires Tech employs a fractal-based resonator that alters the structure of EMFs, making them less biologically stressful. This is not some abstract idea—it’s rooted in physics and well-established principles of wave interference and resonance.
The tech community struggles with this concept because they are trained to think in terms of hard “on/off” data rather than biological interactions.
Linus’ Claims vs. Reality
Claim #1: Aires Devices Don’t Block EMFs, So They Must Be Useless
This claim completely misunderstands Aires Tech’s purpose. Blocking EMFs is not the goal.
Blocking RF signals would make your devices unusable.
Aires Tech restructures the waveform of EMFs, reducing their impact on biological systems.
Traditional RF meters cannot detect this structural change—only biological testing can.
Claim #2: Aires Tech Uses “Technobabble” to Confuse Consumers
This claim is ironic, considering that Linus Tech Tips often delves into deep technical jargon about computer hardware that would confuse the average person.
The truth is that terms like fractal resonance, diffraction, and wave modulation are legitimate physics concepts, not “technobabble.” The fact that these terms are unfamiliar to some doesn’t make them invalid.
To someone unfamiliar with physics, quantum computing terms might sound like nonsense too. That doesn’t mean they aren’t real.
Claim #3: No “Credible” Studies Support Aires Tech’s Effectiveness
This is categorically false. Aires Tech has multiple peer-reviewed studies showing its effects on:
Neural activity (EEG tests) demonstrating reduced hyperactivity under EMF exposure.
Oxidative stress markers, which correlate with chronic inflammation.
Heart rate variability (HRV), a strong indicator of stress resilience.
Additionally, Aires Tech has undergone stringent scrutiny as a publicly traded company, meaning their research had to be vetted before they could be listed.
The misconception that peer-reviewed studies have to come from a handful of cherry-picked journals to be valid is a shortsighted view of how science progresses. Cutting-edge research often gets rejected before it’s eventually accepted, and many game-changing discoveries started as studies dismissed by mainstream publications. That doesn’t invalidate them.
Aires Tech’s technology is backed by 22 global patents, over 25 clinical trials, and 9 peer-reviewed studies. For a deep dive into the technical details and scientific validation of its effectiveness, I recommend reading my recent article breaking down their most prominent study, the “Method for Protecting Biological Objects from the Negative Influence of Technogenic Electromagnetic Radiation.”.
Claim #4: Aires’ Patents Are Just Industrial Designs
Linus Tech Tips suggested that Aires’ patents aren’t scientifically relevant because they are design-based. This is misleading.
Aires Tech holds 22 patents, including industrial design and utility patents, each serving a distinct purpose.
The design patents protect the structural and physical layout of the resonator, ensuring its unique configuration remains proprietary.
The utility patents safeguard the core innovation—the application of diffraction and fractal resonance to electromagnetic fields—marking a breakthrough in EMF modulation technology.
The patents cover the application of wave diffraction and resonance to EMFs, a scientifically novel approach to EMF mitigation.
These patents are recognized under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), giving them global credibility.
Would Linus apply the same logic to Apple’s patents on microchip efficiency? Dismissing patents without understanding their function is an easy way to sound authoritative while missing the entire point.
Claim #5: The Materials Are Cheap, So the Device is Overpriced
Criticizing Aires Tech’s devices based on material cost alone is like saying a violin is overpriced because it’s made of wood. The value lies in the engineering, research, and effectiveness, not the raw materials.
Aires’ silicon resonator interacts with EMFs through wave diffraction and resonance.
The device requires no power source because it passively interacts with EMFs.
It is backed by nearly three decades of research and development.
Would anyone argue that a microchip should be priced based on the cost of silicon alone? Of course not. Complexity and effectiveness dictate price, not raw materials.
Claim #6: RF Radiation Isn’t Dangerous, So Aires Devices Are Unnecessary
This is one of the most reckless claims made in the video.
The WHO has classified RF radiation as a Group 2B carcinogen (potentially carcinogenic to humans).
- A 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling forced the FCC to reevaluate its outdated 1996 RF exposure guidelines (see post below).
- Multiple studies have linked chronic EMF exposure to oxidative stress, gut dysbiosis, melatonin dysregulation, neuroinflammation, and much more.
Long-term exposure to EMFs has been associated with neurological issues, fertility decline, sleep disruption, and hormonal imbalances.
Independent research has documented biological responses to non-ionizing radiation, including increased markers of stress and cellular dysfunction.
Dismissing RF risks altogether is not only scientifically irresponsible but ignores the growing evidence showing measurable biological effects of chronic EMF exposure. The real conversation should be about how to mitigate these effects—not whether they exist.
A Challenge to the Skeptics
For those who, like Linus Tech Tips, doubt the legitimacy of Aires Tech’s technology, I challenge you to dig deeper. Instead of jumping to conclusions based on incomplete testing methods or surface-level assumptions, take the time to investigate all angles of the science.
There are plenty of companies I think are scams, but I would never publicly label them as such without first doing full and proper due diligence. Dismissing something before fully understanding it is an easy way out—it takes effort to truly grasp a complex topic. I encourage skeptics to go beyond basic RF meters and spectrum analyzers, explore the biology behind EMF exposure, and look at the peer-reviewed studies available before making up their minds.
If you’re going to critique something, do it with intellectual honesty, not cognitive laziness.
The Verdict: Misinformation Won’t Win
Aires Tech has spent decades pioneering a solution to an issue that mainstream science is only beginning to acknowledge. Linus Tech Tips’ video did a disservice to this conversation by using misleading tests, dismissive language, and a surface-level understanding of EMFs.
But the truth remains:
Aires Tech does not block EMFs—it restructures them for biological safety.
Peer-reviewed studies confirm the physiological effects of EMF modulation.
The dangers of unchecked EMF exposure are real and well-documented.
Skepticism is healthy. Misinformation is not.
The challenge has been issued. Let’s see if Linus and his team are willing to engage in real scientific inquiry rather than sensationalist takedowns.
